Replace all post_url with Hugo ref blocks
This commit is contained in:
@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ management, and Network time synchronization.
|
||||
|
||||
<br /><br />
|
||||
|
||||
After discussing basic L2, L3 and Overlay functionality in my [[previous post]({% post_url
|
||||
2022-12-05-oem-switch-1 %})], I left somewhat of a cliffhanger alluding to all this fancy MPLS and
|
||||
After discussing basic L2, L3 and Overlay functionality in my [[previous post]({{< ref "2022-12-05-oem-switch-1" >}})], I left somewhat of a cliffhanger alluding to all this fancy MPLS and
|
||||
VPLS stuff. Honestly, I needed a bit more time to play around with the featureset and clarify a few things.
|
||||
I'm now ready to assert that this stuff is really possible on this switch, and if this tickles your fancy, by
|
||||
all means read on :)
|
||||
@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ one shows `NetworkOS-e580-v7.4.4.r.bin` as the firmware, and the smaller one sho
|
||||
`uImage-v7.0.4.40.bin`, I get the impression that the latter is a compiled down version of the
|
||||
former to work with the newer chipset.
|
||||
|
||||
In my [[previous post]({% post_url 2022-12-05-oem-switch-1 %})], I showed L2, L3 and VxLAN, GENEVE
|
||||
In my [[previous post]({{< ref "2022-12-05-oem-switch-1" >}})], I showed L2, L3 and VxLAN, GENEVE
|
||||
and NvGRE capabilities of this switch to be line rate. But the hardware also supports MPLS, so I
|
||||
figured I'd complete the Overlay series by exploring VxLAN, and the MPLS, EoMPLS (L2VPN, Martini
|
||||
style), and VPLS functionality of these units.
|
||||
@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ style), and VPLS functionality of these units.
|
||||
{: style="width:500px; float: right; margin-left: 1em;
|
||||
margin-bottom: 1em;"}
|
||||
|
||||
In the [[IPng Networks LAB]({% post_url 2022-10-14-lab-1 %})], I build the following topology using
|
||||
In the [[IPng Networks LAB]({{< ref "2022-10-14-lab-1" >}})], I build the following topology using
|
||||
the loadtester, packet analyzer, and switches:
|
||||
|
||||
* **msw-top**: S5624-2Z-EI switch
|
||||
@ -75,8 +74,7 @@ work that goes into building such an MPLS enabled telco network.
|
||||
|
||||
### MPLS
|
||||
|
||||
Why even bother, if we have these fancy new IP based transports that I [[wrote about]({% post_url
|
||||
2022-12-05-oem-switch-1 %})] last week? I mentioned that the industry is _moving on_ from MPLS
|
||||
Why even bother, if we have these fancy new IP based transports that I [[wrote about]({{< ref "2022-12-05-oem-switch-1" >}})] last week? I mentioned that the industry is _moving on_ from MPLS
|
||||
to a set of more flexible IP based solutions like VxLAN and GENEVE, as they certainly offer lots of
|
||||
benefits in deployment (notably as overlays on top of existing IP networks).
|
||||
|
||||
@ -338,7 +336,7 @@ PW here means _pseudowire_ and CW means _controlword_. Et, voilà, the fir
|
||||
One very common use case for me at IPng Networks is to work with excellent partners like
|
||||
[[IP-Max](https://www.ip-max.net/)] who provide Internet Exchange transport, for example from DE-CIX
|
||||
or SwissIX, to the customer premises. IP-Max uses Cisco's ASR9k routers, an absolutely beautiful piece
|
||||
of technology [[ref]({% post_url 2022-02-21-asr9006 %})], and with those you can terminate a _L2VPN_ in
|
||||
of technology [[ref]({{< ref "2022-02-21-asr9006" >}})], and with those you can terminate a _L2VPN_ in
|
||||
any sub-interface.
|
||||
|
||||
Let's configure something similar. I take one port on `msw-top`, and branch that out into three
|
||||
@ -537,7 +535,7 @@ And the chassis doesn't even get warm.
|
||||
### Conclusions
|
||||
|
||||
It's just super cool to see a switch like this work as expected. I did not manage to overload it at
|
||||
all, in my [[previous article]({% post_url 2022-12-05-oem-switch-1 %})], I showed VxLAN, GENEVE and
|
||||
all, in my [[previous article]({{< ref "2022-12-05-oem-switch-1" >}})], I showed VxLAN, GENEVE and
|
||||
NvGRE overlays at line rate. Here, I can see that MPLS with all of its Martini bells and whistles,
|
||||
and as well the more advanced VPLS, are keeping up like a champ. I think at least for initial
|
||||
configuration and throughput on all MPLS features I tested, both the small 24x10 + 2x100G switch,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user