ipng/ipng.ch
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Replace all post_url with Hugo ref blocks

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Pim van Pelt
2024-08-05 01:43:55 +02:00
parent c1f1775c91
commit a2f10236a3
56 changed files with 221 additions and 241 deletions

14
content/articles/2024-03-06-vpp-babel-1.md

@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ title: VPP with Babel - Part 1
Ever since I first saw VPP - the Vector Packet Processor - I have been deeply impressed with its
performance and versatility. For those of us who have used Cisco IOS/XR devices, like the classic
_ASR_ (aggregation services router), VPP will look and feel quite familiar as many of the approaches
are shared between the two. Thanks to the [[Linux ControlPlane]({% post_url 2021-08-12-vpp-1 %})]
are shared between the two. Thanks to the [[Linux ControlPlane]({{< ref "2021-08-12-vpp-1" >}})]
plugin, higher level control plane software becomes available, that is to say: things like BGP,
OSPF, LDP, VRRP and so on become quite natural for VPP.
IPng Networks is a small service provider that has built a network based entirely on open source:
[[Debian]({% post_url 2023-12-17-defra0-debian %})] servers with widely available Intel and Mellanox
[[Debian]({{< ref "2023-12-17-defra0-debian" >}})] servers with widely available Intel and Mellanox
10G/25G/100G network cards, paired with [[VPP](https://fd.io/)] for the dataplane, and
[[Bird2](https://bird.nic.cz/)] for the controlplane.
@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ Babel-Bird out for a test flight. Thank you for the Babel-Bird-Build, Summer!
### Babel and the LAB
I decide to take an IPng [[lab]({% post_url 2022-10-14-lab-1 %})] out for a spin. These labs come
I decide to take an IPng [[lab]({{< ref "2022-10-14-lab-1" >}})] out for a spin. These labs come
with four VPP routers and two Debian machines connected like so:
{{< image src="/assets/vpp-mpls/LAB v2.svg" alt="Lab Setup" >}}
@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ IPv6 loopbacks across the network.
IPv6 pings and looks good. However, IPv4 endpoints do not ping yet. The first thing I look at, is
does VPP understand how to interpret an IPv4 route with an IPv6 nexthop? I think it does, because I
remember reviewing a change from Adrian during our MPLS [[project]({% post_url 2023-05-28-vpp-mpls-4
%})], which he submitted in this [[Gerrit](https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/38633)]. His change
remember reviewing a change from Adrian during our MPLS [[project]({{< ref "2023-05-28-vpp-mpls-4" >}})],
which he submitted in this [[Gerrit](https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/38633)]. His change
allows VPP to use routes with `rtnl_route_nh_get_via()` to map them to a different address family,
exactly what I am looking for. The routes are correctly installed in the FIB:
@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ loop0 (up):
```
The Linux ControlPlane configuration will always synchronize interface information from VPP to
Linux, as I described back then when I [[worked on the plugin]({% post_url 2021-08-13-vpp-2 %})].
Linux, as I described back then when I [[worked on the plugin]({{< ref "2021-08-13-vpp-2" >}})].
Babel starts and sets next hops for IPv4 that look like this:
```
@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ to retire the many /31 IPv4 and /112 IPv6 transit networks (which consume about
IPv4 addresses!). I will discuss my change with the VPP and Babel/Bird Developer communities and see
if it makes sense to upstream my changes. Personally, I think it's a reasonable direction, because
(a) both changes are backwards compatible and (b) its semantics are pretty straight forward. I'll
also add some configuration knobs to [[vppcfg]({% post_url 2022-04-02-vppcfg-2 %})] to make it
also add some configuration knobs to [[vppcfg]({{< ref "2022-04-02-vppcfg-2" >}})] to make it
easier to configure VPP in this way.