Relax the LCP requirements - it is OK to have an address without an LCP

unittest/yaml/error-bridgedomain3.yaml

@@ -2,12 +2,10 @@ test:
   description: "Interfaces put into the bridge, can't be L3 (so cannot have an address)"
   errors:
     expected:
-     - "interface .* has an address but no LCP"
-     - "sub-interface .* has an address but .* does not have an LCP"
      - "bridgedomain .* member .* has an address"
      - "interface .* is in L2 mode but has an address"
      - "sub-interface .* is in L2 mode but has an address"
-    count: 9
+    count: 6
 ---
 interfaces:
   GigabitEthernet1/0/0:

unittest/yaml/error-subinterface5.yaml

@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-test:
-  description: "Sub-interface with addresses must have an LCP. Gi1/0/0 does this wrong, while Gi2/0/0 does it correctly"
-  errors:
-    expected:
-     - "sub-interface .* has an address but .* does not have an LCP"
-    count: 1
----
-interfaces:
-  GigabitEthernet1/0/0:
-    sub-interfaces:
-      100:
-        addresses: [ 192.0.2.1/24 ]
-  GigabitEthernet2/0/0:
-    lcp: "xe2-0-0"
-    sub-interfaces:
-      100:
-        addresses: [ 192.168.1.1/24 ]
-